The tragedy at Grenfell Tower is raising many immediate and pressing questions about cladding, fire doors, tower block safety and much more.
Many other issues highlighting just how this catastrophe could have occurred will doubtless be raised by the findings of the various investigations and inquiries.
Almost certainly some of these will question the role of assurances sought and obtained.
Looking through a different lens, I’m left wondering if the faith we place in the third line of defence that is external assurance may just have been very seriously undermined.
There are many business-critical areas where we rely on external experts to double check that we meet legal requirements, regulations, standards and best practice. Or to call us out where we don’t.
We depend on them to be both specialist and independent: to understand the technical details of their subject area and to be confident in telling us where we are not coming up to the mark.
In fire safety, we have all the necessary elements: legislation, regulations, standards and mandatory external assurance.
And yet something still went massively wrong.
In this and other areas of assurance, might we have inadvertently created a detailed tick-box process that muddies the picture rather than gives effective warnings of deficiencies?
Boards and executive teams will oversee many adjustments to assurance policies and practices as we learn the detailed lessons from this horrendous event.
Here are some of my early thoughts on the questions that could in future help us distinguish high quality assurance from box ticking.
The role of assurance, both internal and external, will not diminish moving forwards, but how we procure external assurance and the questions we ask of those appointed to provide it may well.
Grenfell has demonstrated that to deliver well placed confidence, we need to take note of the quality of the assurance we’re receiving.
Executive teams and boards will want to be clear about their respective roles, methods and skill sets, as each has an important and unique role to play.
Sue Harvey is a director at Campbell Tickell, chair of audit and risk assurance at the Housing Ombudsman, and co-chair of HouseMark’s Business Assurance Club.